"Simps" vs "pick me's"
Slim pickins get even slimmer post-election
Our culture is nothing if not extraordinarily reactive, and quite lacking in reflection. When something ostensibly BIG happens, people typically respond as if it were the biggest thing ever; they are thus either ecstatic or despondent, with little middle ground.
Rarely is any effort made to put things in perspective, and thus question the true bigness of the BIG event; the last BIG event is all but forgotten, and all everything BIG which happened before it is all but forgotten, as if we all shared the malady of the protagonist of Memento: a man with no long-term memory whatsoever, perennially preoccupied with the present.
The 2024 US election was deemed one such BIG event, and many of those unhappy with its outcome have evidently lost their collective minds. (Such a trend was easily predictable, of course— see above paragraph.) A large number of extraordinarily vapid women now seem to think we’re now but a hair’s breadth away from living in the Republic of Gilead; in a fit of pique, they have decided to post videos in which they angrily announce that they now plan to swear off having sex with men, or even dressing nicely to attract men. Some have taken the dramatic step of shaving their heads to look intentionally ugly— take THAT, patriarchy! (Of course, similar “sex strikes” were declared post-election in 2016, we might well recall, if, again, anyone in our short-attention span age could actually recall events from so far in the past as eight whole years ago!)
This trend dovetails with the general proclivity of modern online feminists to disparage women who want men to like them as “pick me’s.” The woman called a “pick me” is roughly equivalent to the man mocked by other men as a “simp”; both are scorned for trying too hard to please or flatter the opposite sex.
The difference, however, is that the “pick me” has a far greater chance of success, given that 1) men tend to be fairly generous when it comes to judging women’s looks, meaning that any woman who isn’t obese or hideously deformed is likely to find many worthy male would-be takers, and 2) in our time, any woman with a pleasant demeanor who seems positively inclined towards the male sex is viewed by men, to paraphrase Hamlet, as “one woman picked out of ten thousand.” On the internet, it is not uncommon to hear such women heralded with the declaration, only half-hyperbolic: “We must protect her at all costs.”
The “simp,” however, is likely on a fool’s errand, playing a mug’s game. In setting out to flatter or be pleasing to women, he is already courting their contempt; women tend to view men prone to fawning and self-abasement as pathetic. What is more, women are demonstrably pickier, when it comes to judging men’s looks, than men are with women, so a “simp” will likely be rejected for not being physically prepossessing, even if his unappealingly eager-to-please demeanor is forgiven.
****************************************
Further discouragement of simpery, of course, is the trend I have observed here at length, of what I call the BPD-ization of contemporary women. What we have seen in the case of the various election-aftermath social media freakouts on display is but evidence of an acceleration of this proclivity. Slim pickins are getting slimmer, and more men are opting out.
Andy Nowicki is the author of several books, most recently The Insurrectionist, Muze, and Love and Hidden Agendas, as well as the just-published The Rule of Wrath. Visit his YouTube channel.
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Peace.
The many Western modern twisted delusional psycho Sick womanhood that I and so many suffered and abused from crib through all my career, the hateful betrayal of so many that said they love us, and were by contract and traditions were thought to educate and help-heal or whatever the professions duties in good faith, and the so so many woman that witnessed (except 3) such man-hate that did not warn or act as a man would if they were so treated, or they that lied for them, siding against the man.
'.. their role in a comfortable, safe society that does not need to reproduce at historical rates. The more women have tested men in this way the more men have buckled under the onslaught.' Yes, the 'Shit-test'! - a recently read SubStack article.
If womanhood can be hated instead of only distrusted, avoided, and defended against for self, family and society with warnings if possible - it is in their destruction of Functional [no fault divorce] fatherlessness, destruction of father-child relationship, and the delusional psychotic twisted that exclusively women raising and educating of boys, where such a concept as a 'shit test' is not only rejected if mentioned and avoided by them, so we males will and do think it alien & inconceivable to consider the cause of her insanity, and instead we are indoctrinated to the opposite. So, to the evil-blinding and daily suffering & confusion & needless failure results of Betrayal & Loveless induced ignorance, to life-destroying suicide-inducing slide into hell that often happens
The Loveless psychotic Betrayal of that which I and is widely suffered, it could bring the concept of a Just world where God sends a real Pandemic to kill all women at menopause before they spent the rest of their 40+ years Vomiting Satanic life-love-joy-murdering Horror on children, young women, society, us all, and yes that means the death of many good valued women we still have - but from the sex that votes and encourage men to die for them and society, those women that Betray your children, fathers, yourselves, and us all, so twisted to sicken use all & crap daily into our shared soup-pot, increases horror in most or all places, Offices, they in or hold, and directs government to take more earned resources through taxes, increase wage suppression, destroy small business, .., from men & families - a society where they are justice-immune, able to false-rape accuse and destroy lives and name hidden by law and not punished when discovered or even rewarded, bringers of goddesses unTruth, inJustice, disOrder and damage or breaking all goodness and Joy-bringing.- such that a Pandemic removal of older mostly Poisonous women would give us all the near assurance of a return of world-wide Sanity, Joy, Love, .. such would a that bring - either Repent , or .. well, die, then.
But not today - please.
.
God Bless., Steve
Women want someone to defend them against the chances of the world and provide them with strong offspring. They don't want weak men. This is a generalization but it's the outcome of many thousands of years of natural selection. Men want pretty women because they look healthier and therefore will carry those offspring. It's really that simple. Pick me women are not colluding and that's why they are very successful, and the women who collude are the losers. It's another "Prisoner's Dilemma" type problem. Collusion might be the right solution if everyone were loyal to the cause. Shame is used to compel collusion, but it doesn't work very reliably. Simps are just contemptible.