A Nazi-Jewish non-aggression pact within the Deep State?

Von Ribbentrop, Stalin, and Molotov sign the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact on August 23, 1939

Now some may protest that I am alleging that Nazis, of all people, hold actual power in the "deep state," and that I am singling them out rather that drawing attention to the ahem, "usual suspects," namely that ethnic group whose extreme power and wealth cannot be denied, particularly when considered in proportion to their percentage of the overall population, but whose ubiquitous influence we are forever abjured to ignore, lest we be castigated as allegedly genocidal maniacs or otherwise bad people simply for noticing what is as plain as the noses on their faces (offensive pun intended).

But please be advised, in reaching these conclusions, I am in no way arguing that our current, increasingly precipitous and manifestly and painfully undeniable demise as a culture stems from any single cause. Politics make strange bedfellows, as has often been observed. That is to say, if a Nazi contingent actually holds a significant chokehold over the military-industrial complex and the intelligence apparatus of the United States, which actually seems like a quite distinct possibility, for reasons discussed in my previous article, there is no reason not to suspect that they are likely in cahoots with other forces who seek the same ends, even if those others seek it for radically opposite reasons.

There is even a precedent for such speculation: namely, the notorious Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact of 1939, which for the span of nearly two years turned the two world's two supposedly most ideologically hostile powers into essential allies. This move was undertaken for sheerly tactical reasons on both sides, of course, but it still effectually furthered the expansionist ambitions of both nations, at least for the time being.

One suspects that this unlikely “honeymoon” would surely have ended sooner or later, though it seems that Stalin was totally taken off guard when the full force of Hitler’s "Operation Barbarossa" campaign rolled deep into Soviet territory in June of 1941.

(By the way, could it not be said to be just a bit "Jewy" to break one's word so egregiously and so dishonorably, as Hitler did in this situation? I have never heard a NS-defender tackle this question.)

With “Barbarossa,” all of that previous business about a pledge of "nonaggresion" ceased. Eventually, as we all know with the benefit of hindsight, the effort to capture "Lebensraum" in the East came back to bite the Third Reich big time, though for the first few months things seemed to be proceeding swimmingly for the Wehrmacht. The point, however, is that the notion of forging strategic or tactical alliances is hardly unfamiliar to the National Socialist playbook.

Of course, if my hypothesis is correct, then what we are seeing take place may strikes some as paradoxical: why would the upholders of an ideology founded on racial pride, indeed on racial supremacy, be copacetic about fomenting, or at least consenting in the fomentation, of anti-white multiculturalism, which along with radical feminism and sexual perversion, have been allowed to run rampant ever since the crucial "flex point" in recent history was reached, i.e., the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War?

****************************************

Again (to repeat a point I have made before), it is important to take note of the fact that prior to the late 80s/early 90s, "political correctness" essentially did not exist.

Liberals certainly existed, as did ideologies like feminism, black militancy, and gay rights/liberationism, but it was exceedingly rare for anyone to get in trouble for running afoul of the "PC police." Getting "cancelled" wasn't a thing yet, and wouldn't be for a while. There were a few exceptions, of course, like when sports announcer Howard Cosell got in trouble for calling a black player a "little monkey" (in truth he merely meant to compliment the player's agility), and loveable television curmudgeon Andy Rooney hit a rough patch when it emerged that he found homosexuality disgusting, but both Cosell and Rooney were eventually reinstated and things generally blew over much more quickly than they ever would in the current era of endless accusations and recriminations.

In one hilarious but vulgar monologue delivered in his 1987 concert film "Raw," comedian Eddie Murphy talks of enduring "24 hour homo watch" whenever he visits San Francisco. Again, though his jokes about gays, and his extremely "red-pilled" take on modern women, didn't have any detrimental consequences for Murphy's career.

No, it was only when the Cold War came to an end that normalcy, decency, and wholesomeness came under such relentless fire, and degeneracy began to play an increasingly invasive role in public life. It was only after the collapse of world Communism that "straight white males" began to be collectively assailed for being the locus of evil in the world, etc. It was, that is, only at the timer period past the "flex point" that political correctness, or "PC," or "social justice," or "wokeness" (the demon, like Legion, has many names) grew to hold such sway.

But would a coterie of committed National Socialists agree to unleash such horrors on a population, one which was still majority white? Could they consent to such a plan and still retain their commitment to the cause of advancing racial purity for the Aryan race?

This question, and other relevant matters, I shall take up in my next missive.

Andy Nowicki is the author of several books, most recently The Insurrectionist and Muze. Visit his Youtube channel.