The assassination attempt on Trump and Trump's Epstein betrayal
A causal relationship?
It has been one full year since shots were fired at Donald Trump during a campaign stop in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024.
A year ago, I examined the facts on the ground, and came to the same conclusion as many other people: that, of three possible scenarios when it came to the attempted assassination of then-candidate Trump on that day, the numerous “sus” aspects of the events which unfolded at the rally site lead one to a reasonable, if alarming conclusion, that federal authorities, and other principalities, powers, thrones, and dominions were likely complicit in a plot to murder the President.
Now, almost exactly a year later, with Donald Trump back in the White House, we have witnessed what most “MAGA” types would consider the most egregious stain on the Trump legacy so far: the decision by members of his cabinet to declare the Jeffrey Epstein case “closed,” with the risible assertion that the notorious convicted child sex trafficker was never involved in criminal activities, including blackmail, which implicated scores of high-ranking members of government, the corporate sector, and the entertainment industry, in spite of mounds of evidence to the contrary.
Could the failed assassination attempt of one year ago be related to the Epstein betrayal on Trump’s part?
I consider the matter in more depth here:
While I love "conspiracy theories," I make a constant effort to ground myself on this one because we will simply never know.
That said, the scenario I tend to believe is that a "real" sniper blasted into the crowd, creating the necessary paper trail of carnage to prove the threat was real. One or two other "real" snipers turned that retard into mush before he knew what was happening. The FBI then hosed down the roof and tore down the building the next day, and that was that.
As for how he got there: the retard's handlers convinced him to post up as some sort of "civilian watch." He was recorded strolling through the crowd with his rifle earlier in the afternoon.
The bloody ear was a sleight-of-hand trick, either with a pre-sewn stitch getting pulled out or a pro wrestling-style "blade job" while Trump was under the pile. Probably the fishing wire, though.
For personnel, you'd have 2-3 shooters "in the know," plus 1-2 Secret Service guys next to Trump (for the ear trick), plus the honeypot team. Trump didn't even necessarily "need to know." Sprinkle in a couple short, fat DEI dykes with earpieces into the mix and you've got plenty of chum for the Con, Inc. media cycle to forget to ask any interesting questions.
Is there anything I'm missing? IIRC this was the only Trump rally with CNN coverage out of dozens (much like the Hindenburg blimp). The "one-in-a-million" miss plus the *photograph* of the flying bullet are nice goyslop-tier touches. Also, I'm not certain whether it's been established that this caliber bullet can actually "graze" an ear lobe like that.
As for the dead guy: he heard the crack of the first sniper bullet and immediately knew to throw himself onto his family within what, five seconds? Three? Then he caught a fatal shot, presumably to the back of his torso, that exited cleanly without injuring his charges? I guess if you're poking holes in the conspiracy, you'd say they would've cast a cuter daughter - no way that sort of teen girl goes with family to sit behind Trump at a rally.
When I was a reporter we had a saying. If a story was too good to be true it probably was.
The photo of the Butler assassination attempt was too good to be true.
As for Epstein, it's been obvious for weeks that the material wasn't going to be released, likely because it implicates Mossad.